Corresponding author: Victoria V. Fokina ( viktoriaf2010@mail.ru ) © 2020 Victoria V. Fokina, Rusudan I. Tsikaridze, Alice D. Dudareva, George A. Borisenko.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Fokina VV, Tsikaridze RI, Dudareva AD, Borisenko GA (2020) Analysis of life satisfaction of the older population in Russia based on the RLMS-HSE microdata. Population and Economics 4(3): 57-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.4.e56156
|
Presently, population ageing is one of the main demographic trends in developed countries, including Russia. The article analyzes changes in life satisfaction of individuals aged 45–72 and reflects the main factors influencing this indicator. The research method employed in the study is econometric analysis based on data of the 21st, 23rd, 25th and 27th rounds of the annual Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey – Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE). The analysis showed that such indicators as self-assessment of health, income, having a pension and a permanent marital partner had a significant positive impact on life satisfaction for older individuals. It has been revealed that for both sexes an important factor of life satisfaction is the employment status, while the kind of activity turned out to be not statistically significant. The family status and family composition do not have any significant impact on life satisfaction for men, but they do for women.
older age, employment, life satisfaction, panel data, pension reform, RLMS-HSE, Russia
Population ageing is one of the most striking modern demographic trends in Russia. Thus, according to the high version of the forecast presented by the Russian Federal State Statistic Service (
According to the World Health Organization, over the last 10 years, life expectancy at the age of 60 has been steadily increasing in Russia, which may indicate an improvement in the health care system and, as a result, the ability of people to work longer. In addition, according to the forecast of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation (
Some people have to work upon reaching retirement age, as their income in the form of a pension is not sufficient to maintain their everyday lifestyle. For such employees, having a job can adversely affect the life satisfaction levels. However, there are people who prefer to work at an advanced age in order to maintain social connections, transfer their experience or for other reasons. Usually, such people have better health, they consciously make their choices and, as a result, feel happier.
The relevance of this topic for Russia arises from to the relatively low quality of life of older people. According to the rating of the countries by the quality of life of older people (
The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of employment status on the level of life satisfaction of the older population. The study examines a subjective assessment of the individual well-being of individuals aged 45–72 years old. Given the possibility of early retirement for certain groups, this study includes both middle and older age groups into older population, seeing them as representatives of pre-retirement and retirement ages.
This paper has the following structure: the first part reviews the theoretical literature and reveals the main relationships between indicators under consideration. In the second part, the authors construct an empirical model. In the final part, the main conclusions are drawn from the modelling results.
Many researchers see life satisfaction as an element of subjective well-being (
Subjective well-being can be influenced by individual characteristics such as income, health status, social status, education. However, their evaluation is subjective, as it is obtained in the course of the population survey. The survey requirements are also specified in the recommendations (
Numerous studies have shown a U-shaped relationship between age and the satisfaction level. This is explained by the fact that at a certain stage of life occur such significant life events as wedding, birth of children, retirement and others (
In the work of Rosa Kutubaeva (
Many studies hypothesize the relationship between place of residence and life satisfaction in older ages. In the work of Salman Zaidi and co-authors (
Studying the effects of health on life satisfaction level is of particular interest to many researchers. The analysis of such relationship is highly relevant when assessing the level of life satisfaction of the older population. In their work, Anne Berg and co-authors (
Most studies use factors such as gender, education, having a job, income and family status as control variables while estimating the level of life satisfaction. These factors alone may not be significant. However, in a large number of studies, separate analysis of results, for example for men and women, can show different results. Thus, Silvia Meggiolaro and Fausta Ongaro (
A number of studies have shown that income also has a positive impact on the life satisfaction levels of older people (
The question of how much life satisfaction depends on the employment status has interested many researchers. The study by Yanni Hao (
In the study by Andrew Clark and co-authors (
However, some studies have found an inverse relationship between life satisfaction and work (
One of the local studies of the life satisfaction level of older persons (
The study was conducted on the basis of panel data of the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey – Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE), rounds 18–21. Russians aged over 55 were included in the sample. Ordered logit models, as well as OLS models with fixed and random effects were used to obtain empirical results. According to the results of the study, belonging to a particular gender is not a significant variable itself, however, gender factors to some extent affect the well-being of men and women. In Russia, married men tend to be happier than married women while ageing. Having children for men is not a significant factor, and for women it has a weak and negative effect on subjective well-being. In other studies (
For older women, the most important factors are employment status, education and health self-assessment. The level of education is significant for women and has a positive impact on their well-being, while for men the factor has a weak negative effect. With age, working women also feel much happier than their male counterparts. Perhaps this is because, for women in older ages, work is not so much about income as it is about being able to communicate with others and build social relations.
Thus, the literature review identified the following groups of factors potentially determining the level of life satisfaction of the older population: (1) age, gender and place of residence; (2) health and its self-assessment by individuals; (3) characteristics of socioeconomic status: education, income, employment status, type of occupation; (4) family and family bonds defined by the number of children, the marriage status and the number of household members.
The following hypotheses are tested within this study:
This study is based on examining the impact of the individual employment characteristics on the level of life satisfaction of older persons. This choice is justified by the observed gradual increase in the labour supply among the population aged over 45. The pension reform is expected to enhance this trend in the coming years, which is why employment status may be one of the most significant factors influencing the subjective assessment of the individual well-being. Besides, the authors suggest that the type of occupation may have an additional significant impact on the level of life satisfaction due to the existing differences in the type of job and labour conditions, as well as in the type of employment.
Thus, the distinguishing feature of this study is the inclusion of the employees’ qualification level.
The study bases on the data from the annual Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey – Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE). The survey is conducted on the basis of repeated sample with split-panel, which allows to ensure the representativeness of each wave for the population of Russia and simultaneously maintain the maximum size of the panel sub-sample.
The authors took the data coming from the 21st, 23rd, 25th and 27th rounds, which corresponds to the questionnaires of the years 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018. This study considers a subsample of individuals of both sexes whose age ranges from 45 to 72 during the whole observation period.
Respondents who did not participate in all four rounds, as well as individuals who lacked necessary data for analysis were excluded from the final sample. Moreover, zero-income respondents being retired or employed were also omitted, as well as individuals whose experience after retirement was more than 28 years, as they could be attributed to statistical outliers and such answers could be linked to misperceptions of the survey questions. The final consisted of 8,436 observations: 2,109 individuals in each of the four rounds under review. All variables were extracted from individual RLMS files, however, data on the numbers of household members were taken from household files. Subsequently, all discrete variables, except self-assessment of health and life satisfaction, were converted to binary.
The authors treat employed individuals, as well as individuals being on maternity leave or on any other paid leave as working, and all others as not working. The education level is considered within three categories: no secondary education (unfinished secondary education), secondary education and higher education.
Data on the occupational status of respondents were divided into five groups according to the International Standard Classification of Occupations ISCO-08: armed forces occupations (ISCO 0), highly skilled workers (ISCO 1–3), clerks and employees (ISCO 4–5), skilled workers (ISCO 6–8), elementary occupations (ISCO 9). The life satisfaction variable was left unchanged in the form of a discrete value from 1 (fully satisfied) to 5 (not satisfied at all). The Appendix
The results of preliminary data analysis (descriptive statistics) for the variables under consideration are presented in Tables
Variable | Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
Age | 58.33 | 6.34 | 45 | 72 |
Income | 19,633 | 17,800 | 0 | 312,392 |
Child (number of children) | 1.90 | 0.82 | 1 | 9 |
Stageposl (experience after retirement in years) | 2.41 | 4.11 | 0 | 28 |
Fam_num (number of family members) | 2.94 | 1.70 | 1 | 16 |
Variable | Value labels | Sample % | Number of observations |
Life satisfaction level, self-assessment on five-point scale | Fully satisfied | 5 | 436 |
Rather satisfied | 41 | 3443 | |
Both yes and no (partially satisfied) | 25 | 2089 | |
Not very satisfied | 22 | 1849 | |
Not at all satisfied | 7 | 619 | |
Education | Unfinished secondary education | 11 | 953 |
Secondary education | 66 | 5609 | |
Higher education | 22 | 1874 | |
Type_set (place of residence) | City or regional center | 60 | 5040 |
Village or small town | 40 | 3396 | |
Marriage (marital status) | Single or widowed | 30 | 2518 |
Married or lives with a partner | 70 | 5918 | |
Sex | Male | 34 | 2896 |
Female | 66 | 5540 | |
Work (employment status) | Working | 50 | 4204 |
Not working | 50 | 4232 | |
Pension (having a pension) | Yes | 68 | 5749 |
No | 32 | 2687 | |
Disabled (having a disability category) | Yes | 89 | 7538 |
No | 11 | 898 | |
Health self-assessment on five-point scale | Very good | 0.4 | 30 |
Good | 15 | 1260 | |
Medium | 68 | 5773 | |
Bad | 15 | 1277 | |
Very bad | 1 | 96 | |
Occupation | Armed forces occupations | 0 | 2 |
Highly skilled workers | 21 | 1803 | |
Clerks and employees (wclerk) | 11 | 921 | |
Skilled workers | 13 | 1066 | |
Elementary occupations | 5 | 412 |
The average age of the respondents in the sample is 58 years. The share of respondents living in the city or regional center is 60%, and the share of women reaches 66%. 50% of respondents work, 68% receive a pension. Average individual income is 19,635 RUB per month. In general, individuals assess their health by 3.02 points – according to the scale used in the survey, the value of 3 stands for average, which is “neither good nor bad.” Average life satisfaction in the sample is 2.85 points, because respondents believe that they are equally satisfied and dissatisfied with their lives. The average length of experience after retirement is approximately 2.4 years.
The correlation matrix (Appendix
To see what proportion of men and women attribute themselves to the most or least satisfied with their life, we can take a look at Fig.
Distribution by life satisfaction level among working and non-working men and women of older age. Source: calculations of the authors based on RLMS-HSE data of the 21st, 23rd, 25th and 27th rounds.
Most respondents are rather satisfied with their life, and life satisfaction is higher among working individuals of both sexes. Based on the results of preliminary data analysis, it can be assumed that older persons who are unemployed have a lower level of life satisfaction than those who keep working. Now, let’s move on to econometric modelling in order to assess the impact of employment status on the level of life satisfaction among older population.
To test the study hypotheses we used the variables described above, and also created five new ones that were calculated as the product of a binary employment status and the occupation type in order to estimate the life satisfaction dependence from the characteristics of employment. It should be noted that the wclerk variable, which is responsible for individuals who are clerks and service and retail employees, was not included in the models in order to avoid multicollinearity. The clerks themselves stand for a reference group.
Given the panel structure of the data, we estimate the OLS model with fixed and random effects first, along with a pooled regression. Hausman test showed that the model with fixed effects was more preferable, and the results of its estimation are presented in Table
Results of the estimation of OLS-regressions with fixed effects (in brackets under coefficients there are robust standard errors; asterisks located to the right of coefficients indicate the significance of variables: *** significant at a 1% level, ** significant at a 5% level, * significant at a 10% level).
Dependent variable – Life satisfaction level | |||
---|---|---|---|
Variables | FE both sexes |
FE men |
FE women |
Marriage (marital status) | −0.255*** | −0.141 | −0.277*** |
(0.066) | (0.173) | (0.072) | |
Education | 0.066 | 0.111* | 0.005 |
(0.053) | (0.067) | (0.085) | |
Age | −0.029 | −0.101 | 0.006 |
(0.040) | (0.067) | (0.052) | |
Age2 (age squared) | 0.000 | 0.001 | −0.000 |
(0.000) | (0.001) | (0.000) | |
Work (employment status) | −0.300*** | −0.225** | −0.326*** |
(0.060) | (0.102) | (0.074) | |
Child (number of children) | −0.085 | 0.047 | −0.232*** |
(0.059) | (0.078) | (0.086) | |
Pension (having a pension) | −0.121*** | −0.152** | −0.121** |
(0.042) | (0.063) | (0.057) | |
Health (self-assessment of health) | 0.189*** | 0.214*** | 0.173*** |
(0.025) | (0.043) | (0.031) | |
Disabled (having a disability category) | 0.111 | 0.314** | 0.007 |
(0.088) | (0.149) | (0.106) | |
Stageposl (experience after retirement) | −0.011 | −0.022 | −0.007 |
(0.007) | (0.013) | (0.008) | |
Fam_num (number of family members) | −0.010 | −0.009 | −0.012 |
(0.015) | (0.025) | (0.018) | |
Log_income | −0.042*** | −0.047*** | −0.035** |
(0.011) | (0.016) | (0.015) | |
Wvoen (employed in armed forces) | 0.227 | – | 0.246 |
(0.443) | (0.449) | ||
Wmanag (employed highly skilled worker) | −0.029 | −0.134 | 0.008 |
(0.064) | (0.125) | (0.074) | |
Wrab (employed skilled worker) | 0.048 | −0.036 | 0.118 |
(0.074) | (0.112) | (0.113) | |
Wnequal (employed in elementary occupations) | −0.005 | −0.249 | 0.052 |
(0.087) | (0.173) | (0.101) | |
Constant | 3.978*** | 5.430*** | 3.424** |
(1.171) | (1.903) | (1.555) | |
Number of observations | 8,436 | 2,896 | 5,540 |
Number of i | 2,109 | 724 | 1,385 |
LSDV R-squared | 0.605 | 0.603 | 0.604 |
Estimates of the OLS model with fixed effects show that such indicators as marriage and employment status, pension and income have a significant positive impact on life satisfaction level among older persons of both sexes. Health self-assessment also significantly affects life satisfaction – life satisfaction level decreases with the decline in health. The coefficients estimates for variables age and age squared are not statistically significant, suggesting that age has no effect on life satisfaction. This may be explained by the use of fixed effects, which include the factor of belonging to a particular generation and neutralize the influence of age.
Estimating the same model separately for men and women reveals the following differences. Unlike men, for whom family status is not a statistically significant factor, for women marital status has a positive impact on life satisfaction. Also having a child in the family makes a woman happier, while the influence of this factor on life satisfaction among men is absent. Most likely, the insignificance of the variables standing for family status and having children for men might be explained by the fact that in Russia the traditional family pattern, in which women pay more attention to family and household, is predominantly preserved. Disability has a significant negative impact on life satisfaction level for men, when for women we do not observe this correlation. According to our assumption, this may also be related to patriarchalism – the official disability status can negatively affect men’s activities, reduce their business activity and lead to difficulties in maintaining the status of the head of the family. The education level turns out to be significant at a 0.1 level, but only in the male sub-sample, and this factor has a weak negative effect on individual life satisfaction.
The literature analysis showed, that quite a number of authors use probability models since in some cases they are better suited for population surveys. Taking into account the panel data structure, we have estimated binary logit models with fixed effects for each gender. The dependent variable life satisfaction was transformed into a binary form, where 0 is attributed to individuals satisfied with their life (answers 1, 2 or 3), and 1 to those not satisfied (answers 4 and 5). The estimates of this model are given in Table
Results of the estimation of logit-models with fixed effects (in brackets under coefficients there are robust standard errors; asterisks located to the right of coefficients indicate the significance of variables: *** significant at a 1% level, ** significant at a 5% level, * significant at a 10% level).
Dependent variable –Life satisfaction in binary form | |||
---|---|---|---|
Logit FE | Logit FE | Logit FE | |
Variables | all | men | women |
Marriage (marital status) | −0.561*** | 0.289 | −0.697*** |
(0.198) | (0.580) | (0.214) | |
Education | −0.047 | 0.157 | −0.244 |
(0.207) | (0.306) | (0.283) | |
Age | −0.075 | −0.445* | 0.124 |
(0.141) | (0.239) | (0.180) | |
Age2 (age squared) | 0.001 | 0.004* | −0.001 |
(0.001) | (0.002) | (0.002) | |
Work (employment status) | −0.692*** | −0.399 | −0.824*** |
(0.185) | (0.337) | (0.224) | |
Child (number of children) | −0.164 | 0.175 | −0.523** |
(0.172) | (0.247) | (0.250) | |
Pension (having a pension) | −0.414*** | −0.452* | −0.456** |
(0.157) | (0.269) | (0.198) | |
Health (self-assessment of health) | 0.445*** | 0.661*** | 0.340*** |
(0.083) | (0.146) | (0.102) | |
Disabled (having a disability category) | 0.056 | 0.296 | −0.123 |
(0.284) | (0.451) | (0.371) | |
Stageposl (experience after retirement) | −0.010 | -0.017 | −0.011 |
(0.024) | (0.045) | (0.028) | |
Fam_num (number of family members) | −0.084* | −0.108 | −0.081 |
(0.050) | (0.091) | (0.061) | |
Log_income | −0.097*** | −0.103** | −0.086** |
(0.031) | (0.046) | (0.044) | |
Wvoen (employed in armed forces) | 12.08 | - | 11.54 |
(619.7) | (446.8) | ||
Wmanag (employed highly skilled worker) | −0.302 | −0.419 | −0.253 |
(0.224) | (0.456) | (0.260) | |
Wrab (employed skilled worker) | −0.269 | −0.534 | −0.129 |
(0.236) | (0.370) | (0.356) | |
Wnequal (employed in elementary occupations) | −0.085 | −0.575 | 0.038 |
(0.267) | (0.599) | (0.300) | |
Number of observations | 4,168 | 1,340 | 2,828 |
In the logit model with fixed effects, statistically significant variables are marital and employment status, availability of pension and income level; all of them positively affect life satisfaction level. In addition, when assessing the sample for both sexes, we find the number of household members to be significant at a 10% level – the more members of one household live together, the higher is the level of life satisfaction of the respondent. However, this result is not robust; when considering each gender individually, we find this factor to be statistically insignificant.
Differences in the results obtained for the logit model with fixed effects estimated separately for men and women are partly similar to those of the OLS model – marital status is insignificant in the male sub-sample, and having children has a positive impact on women’s life satisfaction. In addition, the employment status loses its significance for men, which we associate with the possible error growth due to the shift to a binary model.
The results of the estimation allow us to confirm the hypothesis that there is a positive impact of work on life satisfaction level for both sexes. The positive impact of obtaining a pension, which is additional income, on life satisfaction is also confirmed. The hypothesis on differences in life satisfaction between individuals with different occupational status is not confirmed: the occupation does not have a significant impact on life satisfaction.
The results obtained in the course of the study largely confirm the results previously obtained by other authors. Thus, high income and job availability have a positive effect on life satisfaction of older people in Russia (
Still, some of our results differ from those previously published by other authors. Having children increases life satisfaction among older women, which is inconsistent with other results (
The peculiarity of this study is that it aims to examine in more detail the relationship between employment and life satisfaction in older ages. The work confirmed a positive relationship between employment status and life satisfaction: on average, a person who has a job is more likely to be happy. This can be explained by the fact that employed people usually lead a more active social life, give a better assessment of their health, and are busy most of the time.
According to the results of this study, the Russian state should actively develop a set of measures aimed at improving the quality of life of older people. In particular, pensions should be monitored and indexed in a timely manner in order to maintain constant purchasing power; social and health care expenditure should be raised for persons of older age. Given the importance of the employment factor, attention should also be paid to stimulating the economic activity of older persons. This requires making employment more accessible to the older population, increasing labour market flexibility, expanding retraining programs and expanding opportunities for self-employment. The implementation of a set of such measures will have a positive impact on the factors of subjective well-being of older persons.
A number of limitations should be taken into account when considering and interpreting the results of this study.
In order to determine the health level of individuals, as well as their level of life satisfaction, we examine the indicators subjectively assessed by each of the respondents. Using health self-assessment as a proxy-variable can produce biased estimates of real health level. However, the use of a subjective indicator enables seeing direction and assessing the importance of health influence on the level of well-being of older individuals.
The transformation of a categorical dependent variable into a binary one for the logit regression could lead to a decrease in the accuracy of the obtained results. Within the current analysis, the dependence of life satisfaction level on major significant factors persists in different specifications, including those with a binary variable. However, in future studies, ordered logit model can be constructed to preserve the discreteness of the dependent variable.
The study does not take into account the frequency of changing individual qualifications. However, this indicator is of great interest since the concept of lifelong learning is now spreading actively. Continuing education is provided by the state by creating opportunities for the development of competences and changing qualifications at any age. Such changes in the labour sector can have a significant impact on the subjective level of individual well-being. Therefore, studying the influence of the frequency of changing qualifications may be the next step in analyzing older people’s life satisfaction.
The study found that the main determinants of older people’s life satisfaction are the characteristics of their socioeconomic status: income level, employment status, marital status and health self-assessment. There are some gender differences, in particular, marital status has a significant impact on women’s life satisfaction, and men are less happy when they have an officially stated disability. The results of this study may be useful in developing for the development of the state support measures aimed at improving the quality and standard of living of older people.
In the future, it is possible to improve this study by including factors of satisfaction with working conditions and work schedules. Amid the constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, there are many citizens of working age forced to work remotely. In the future, this situation could lead to an increase in the number of people working from home, including older people. In this regard, there is an interest in studying the impact of remote work on life satisfaction of older persons.
The authors expresses their gratitude to the Candidate of Economics, Associate Professor of Lomonosov Moscow State University N.M. Kalmykova for valuable comments and assistance in conducting the research.
Victoria V. Fokina, Bachelor Student, Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: viktoriaF2010@mail.ru
Rusudan I. Tsikaridze, Bachelor Student, Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: tzikaridze2010@gmail.com
Alice D. Dudareva, Bachelor Student, Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: aldudareva@gmail.com
George A. Borisenko, Bachelor Student, Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: Borisenko.georgiy99@gmail.com
Indicator | Designations in models | Unit of measure | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Life satisfaction | Satisfaction | Discrete value from 1 to 5 | Answer to the question: “How satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?” 1 – fully satisfied 2 – rather satisfied 3 – both yes and no 4 – not very satisfied 5 – not at all satisfied |
Place of residence | Type _set | Dummy | 1 – city, regional center; 0 – village, urban-type settlement |
Age | Age | Years | Number of full years (year of interview, minus year of birth of respondent) |
Age squared | Age2 | Age squared | Number of full years squared to check for the presence of a nonlinear relationship of age and life satisfaction level. |
Sex | Sex | Dummy | 1 – female; 0 – male |
Employment status | Work | Dummy | 1 – employed; 0 – not employed |
Marital status | Marriage | Dummy | 1 – is married/living with a partner; 0 – not married/widow (widower) |
Education | Education | Discrete value from 0 to 2 | 0 – unfinished secondary; 1 – finished secondary; 2 – higher education |
Number of children | Child | Number of children | Answer to the question: “How many children do you have?” |
Availability of pension | Pension | Dummy | 1 – yes; 0 – no |
Health self-assessment | Health | Discrete value from 1 to 5 | Answer to the question “How do you assess your health. Is it...”: 1 – very good; 2 – good; 3 – medium, nei her good nor bad; 4 – bad; 5 – very bad |
Disability | Disabled | Dummy | Answer to the question “Do you have any disability group assigned to you? ”: 1 – yes; 0 – no |
Income | Income | Number | The answer in rubles to the question: “How much money have you personally received during the last 30 days, considering everything: salary, pensions, bonuses, profits, benefits, financial assistance, casual earnings and other cash receipts?” |
Number of family members | Fam_num | Number | Number of household members named by a respondent |
Work experience after retirement | Stageposl | Years | Number of years of work experience after retirement named by a respondent |
Type of employment | Discrete value from 1 to 9 | ISCO–08 Profession Code | |
Armed forces occupations (ISCO-0) | Voen | ||
Highly skilled workers (ISCO 1-3) | Manag | ||
Office workers and employees (ISCO 4-5) | Clerk | ||
Skilled workers (ISCO 6-8) | Rab | ||
Elementary occupations (ISCO-9) | Nequal |
Variables | Satisfaction | Type_set | Marriage | Educ | Age | Sex | Work | Health | Disabled | Income |
Satisfaction | 1.00 | |||||||||
Type_set | −0.02 | 1.00 | ||||||||
Marriage | −006 | −008 | 1.00 | |||||||
Educ | −0.12 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Age | 0.10 | 0.07 | −0.10 | 0.02 | 1.00 | |||||
Sex | 0.02 | 0.04 | −0.34 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 1.00 | ||||
Work | −0.24 | 0.04 | −0.02 | 0.10 | −0.53 | −0.04 | 1.00 | |||
Health | 0.29 | −0.02 | −0.14 | −0.11 | 0.25 | 0.15 | −0.27 | 1.00 | ||
Disabled | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.03 | −0.12 | 0.19 | −0.02 | −0.28 | 0.35 | 1.00 | |
Income | −0.28 | 0.14 | −0.04 | 0.23 | −0.07 | −0.03 | 0.44 | −0.17 | −0.09 | 1.00 |